Tidal平台发布AI政策，明确禁止使用其音乐内容训练人工智能模型，强调保护艺术家版权和作品完整性，反对未经授权的AI数据抓取行为。

Tidal.com 的 AI 政策页面标题为“tidal.com”，来源网址为 https://tidal.com/ai-policy。页面警告称，访问可能需要通过 CAPTCHA 验证，请确保您有权访问此页面。该页面内容以 Markdown 格式呈现，但未提供具体政策细节。

根据评论内容，总结如下：

主要观点与论据：

1. 支持AI音乐但要求标注与去货币化（多数评论认可）

   • 评论3（mc32）：“I like what I see from their policy. They accept that it’s part of the industry landscape and also say it’s not monetizeable.”
   • 评论5（jorisw）：“Allow AI, but require labeling as such, and demonetize. Would love for YouTube to follow suit on this.”

2. 反对AI音乐混入人类音乐，要求完全屏蔽选项（部分评论）

   • 评论16（keiferski）：“I really hope someone makes a music platform in the future that is verified as human-made. Music is about connecting to human emotions, not poor facsimiles of it.”
   • 评论26（dkhenry）：“I just want Tidal and Spotify to give me the option to fully opt-out of AI generated music. I don’t want it mixed in with my music.”

3. 对检测技术可行性的质疑（技术性观点）

   • 评论17（preetham_rangu）：“The detection problem is genuinely hard... detecting AI-generated music at the audio layer seems like a cat and mouse game that Tidal will struggle to win without self-reporting from uploaders.”
   • 评论29（yellowapple）：“The only thing worrying to me is the use of ‘AI detection technology’; that stuff is notorious for both false positives and false negatives.”

4. 对政策细节的困惑（定义模糊问题）

   • 评论12（elicash）：“I think this needs more clarity. I can think of a lot of different ways AI is used in music today... If someone uses ChatGPT for lyrics, but writes the instrumentals themselves, does this policy apply?”

5. 对去货币化逻辑的质疑（商业矛盾）

   • 评论18（butlike）：“AKA: We will take the value, if any, AI-generated music gives, but we will not be paying royalties. This is a contradictory statement.”

平衡性总结： - 多数评论认可Tidal“允许AI但标注+去货币化”的折中政策，认为能减少垃圾内容。 - 部分用户强烈要求完全屏蔽AI音乐，认为AI音乐缺乏人类情感价值。 - 技术层面，检测AI音乐的可靠性被普遍质疑，认为可能陷入猫鼠游戏。 - 政策定义模糊（如“substantially AI-generated”）引发对执行一致性的担忧。 - 少数评论质疑去货币化逻辑，认为平台可能利用AI音乐获利却不支付版税。