文章摘要
Anthropic指控DeepSeek、Moonshot AI和MiniMax通过创建2.4万个虚假账户,与Claude进行1600万次交互,大规模窃取其模型能力用于训练自身模型。
文章总结
【精简内容】
Anthropic公司通过X平台发布声明称,其AI模型Claude遭到DeepSeek、Moonshot AI和MiniMax三家机构的"工业级知识蒸馏攻击"。这些机构通过创建超过2.4万个虚假账户,与Claude进行了超1600万次交互对话,以此提取模型能力用于训练和改进自身AI系统。
(保留核心事实:攻击主体、手段规模、具体数据;删除冗余的社交媒体界面描述、趋势话题等无关信息)
评论总结
以下是评论内容的总结,平衡呈现不同观点并保留关键引用:
1. 技术可行性观点
认为AI模型蒸馏技术门槛不高,16万次会话即可实现效果。
- falcor84: "~16 million sessions is enough to distill Claude... it just looks very feasible"
- kgeist: "If a single session is at least 32k tokens, then it's already 0.5 trillion tokens to train on"
2. * hypocrisy批评*
多数评论指责Anthropic等公司自身使用未经授权数据训练模型,却反对他人效仿。
- cs702: "Anthropic... have been criticized for using copyrighted materials without permission"
- paxys: "Anthropic itself is fighting multiple high-profile lawsuits over unauthorized use"
- rsynnott: "Oh, now we care about IP, do we?"
3. 支持中国AI实验室
认为中国公司通过蒸馏技术降低成本、促进竞争,是市场的积极力量。
- logicprog: "Chinese labs... making it freely accessible... good for competition"
- impulser_: "The only reason AI is affordable is because of these Chinese AI labs"
- xanthor: "China is the only country that actually has the capacity to deeply integrate AI"
4. 知识产权争议
部分用户认为知识应共享,反对AI公司垄断模型。
- lousken: "Good, if you don’t release open weights, someone else does"
- zb3: "I hope so, I don't need their 'safeguards'"
- armcat: "Who is the thief? How far will the Alice go?"(以寓言式评论讽刺所有权争议)
5. 监管与商业策略讨论
推测Anthropic可能寻求政策保护或限制API开放。
- veselin: "Likely they will seek regulation that would ban some models"
- karmasimida: "Unless they stop selling APIs to the public this can’t be stopped"
- bakugo: "They’re just another corporation with the standard goal of making money"
6. 讽刺与幽默
大量评论以反讽回应,认为事件本身具有荒诞性。
- stefan_: "Anthropic... ran an industrial-scale distillation attack... kindly go fuck yourself"
- gostsamo: "You are trying to kidnap what I have rightfully stolen"(引用《加勒比海盗》台词)
- eagleinparadise: "world's smallest violin meme"(配文“世界上最小的小提琴”讽刺 Anthropic 的抱怨)
总结:评论普遍认为Anthropic的指控存在双重标准,同时肯定蒸馏技术对降低AI门槛的价值。争议焦点集中在知识产权伦理与行业竞争公平性。