文章摘要
该网页无法访问,可能是暂时性故障或已永久迁移,显示HTTP2协议错误。具体内容关于美光科技退出消费级业务的消息无法获取。
文章总结
美光科技投资者页面无法访问提示
访问美光科技投资者关系页面时出现错误提示,该页面可能暂时无法连接或已永久迁移至新地址。具体涉及以下网址:
https://investors.micron.com/news-releases/news-release-details/micron-announces-exit-crucial-consumer-business(后接长串验证参数)
系统返回ERRHTTP2PROTOCOL_ERROR协议错误,页面内容显示该网址可能处于以下两种状态之一: 1. 暂时性服务中断 2. 已永久迁移至新地址
(注:原文中重复出现的相同网址及技术参数已作合并处理,保留了关键错误信息)
评论总结
评论总结:
对美光退出消费级业务的批评
- 认为这是短视的商业决策,可能损害长期品牌价值。
- 引用评论18:"What a short-sighted, boneheaded move. I’m so tired of the MBA-ificiation of every single part of my life."
- 引用评论11:"Having a consumer facing brand is 'crucial' for brand awareness. Micron is the smallest of the big 3 in DRAM... They’re going to be swallowed up."
对AI热潮的质疑
- 批评AI驱动需求导致资源分配失衡,忽视实际需求。
- 引用评论6:"The idiotic waste of gigantic amounts of civilizatory resources, for something that hasn’t remotely proven useful yet."
- 引用评论17:"This will surely maximize quarterly profits until the next cloud or AI bust."
对Crucial品牌的怀念与肯定
- 用户普遍认为Crucial产品质量可靠,退出是巨大损失。
- 引用评论9:"This is very sad. I’ve been using Crucial for decades, the most reliable I have ever had."
- 引用评论15:"Their MX500 series SSDs were just king of price, performance and reliability."
对供应链和假货问题的担忧
- 退出可能导致消费者更难买到正品内存。
- 引用评论8:"Crucial offered a supply chain direct from Micron... Most other consumer DRAM sources pass through middlemen."
- 引用评论13:"I’ve been buying Crucial as an attempt to avoid counterfeits."
对企业战略的争议
- 部分人认为专注企业市场是合理选择,但完全退出消费级市场过于激进。
- 引用评论12:"Even just limiting stock... would let you say 'oh, it’s just the market'."
- 引用评论2:"Micron are estimated to have 23% and 21% of global revenue for DRAM and HBM... Obviously enterprise is incredibly lucrative."
对行业未来的悲观预测
- 担心其他厂商效仿,进一步损害消费者利益。
- 引用评论14:"If this AI boom continues we’re going to see Nvidia exit from consumer GPU business."
- 引用评论16:"I’m sure that decision will look real smart in 3 years time."
总结:评论普遍对美光的决策持负面态度,认为其过于追逐短期利润,忽视品牌价值和消费者需求,并可能加剧行业垄断和假货问题。