文章摘要
Python软件基金会(PSF)因拒绝接受一项反多元化(anti-DEI)的联邦拨款后,获得了捐赠激增。这反映了开源社区对多元化、公平和包容性(DEI)价值观的坚定支持。
文章总结
Python软件基金会(PSF)因拒绝反DEI联邦拨款获捐赠热潮
2025年11月9日,Python软件基金会(PSF)因拒绝美国国家科学基金会(NSF)一项附带反多元化、公平与包容(DEI)条款的150万美元拨款申请后,意外获得了来自社区的巨额捐赠支持。
事件核心: - PSF原计划用这笔为期两年的拨款开发自动化工具,以增强PyPI软件包注册中心的安全性防御供应链攻击 - 但在最终阶段发现拨款条款要求"在资助期间终止所有DEI相关项目" - PSF董事会经一致表决后决定拒绝这笔占其年度预算30%的拨款
社区反响: - 公告发布当天即收到300笔捐赠 - 两周内募得超15.7万美元,新增295位年费会员 - Python之父Guido van Rossum公开表示支持 - 相关讨论在Reddit、Hacker News等平台获得数千点赞 - 包括谷歌开源团队在内的多家科技企业发声支持
后续影响: - 原定的PyPI自动化审查系统开发计划被迫搁置 - PSF表示将寻求欧洲资助和企业合作等替代方案 - 基金会强调将继续通过现有机制(如可信发布、软件物料清单等)维护生态安全
这一事件凸显了开源社区在价值观与资金之间的抉择,也展示了Python生态强大的凝聚力。尽管面临财务压力,PSF仍坚持其"将社区和DEI价值观置于资金之上"的立场。
评论总结
总结评论内容:
- 关于政治与平权关系的讨论:
观点1:认为政治环境变化推动了跨性别权利发展 "the whole flourishing of trans rights and acceptance between 2017 and 2021 never would have happened if Hillary had won" "Did both parties implicitly understand...going too hard too fast is counterproductive?"
观点2:认为资助只需符合宪法平等保护条款 "The grant simply required that the recipient comply with the equal protection clause"
- 关于DEI(多元平等包容)政策的争议:
- 质疑DEI必要性 "DEI isn't necessary for a volunteer project" "Why does it matter how many of a project's contributors are transgender?"
- 对Python软件基金会(PSF)的批评:
- 认为管理层脱离实际 "Python's stance on this...shows that management is out of touch with reality"
- 因Tim Peters事件影响捐赠意愿 "after what they did to Tim Peters...I don't see myself donating"
- 关于政府资助的争论:
- 反对政府资助 "The government shouldn't be spending itself further into unsustainable debt" "state funding...will always be subject to the politics of the state"
- 支持拒绝资助 "Good for them. This admin can take their money and go fuck themselves"
- 对资助条款的担忧:
- 认为非营利组织陷入两难 "place a non-profit in a double bind...attempting to comply would allow a politicized IRA to claim failure"
- 指出新条款的普遍性 "yep that seems to be the case" [附NSF资助条款链接]